Comments on: Charlottetown: Milks and Rectangles

By: Kate McKenna

Kate McKenna — Fri, 31 Jul 2009 23:37:24 +0000

That first comment is baffling for a few reasons, the least of which isn’t that there’s nothing wrong with this in terms of journalism.

That said, I’m pretty stoked that I don’t get detestable wallops in my throat when I read poor journalism. That would put me off most news, I think.

Anyhow, I’m going to collect some wares for the grim, ghastly days that lay ahead on the blogosphere . . . . some water bottles, flashlights, and a usb cable for my ipod.

By: Bronwyn

Bronwyn — Fri, 31 Jul 2009 04:25:56 +0000

Andie, another awesome blog! I really love your presentation and perspective on that which you write about. Never a dull read, always something new or interesting to find out about! Some people should spend more time mowing their lawns and less time with a thesaurus trying to sound intelligent!

By: Scarlett

Scarlett — Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:52:58 +0000

I’ve enjoyed this blog from day one. I think Andie’s take on fashion in Charlottetown is fun and hilarous. I like the pop culture references. I like the way she forms her sentences. I just like it.

I respect everyone’s right to an opinion, but I think calling Andie lacklustre, when you probably don’t know her, is going a little far. She’s clearly a passionate person.

I also think that everyone reading this blog should keep in mind that Charlottetown is a small place. Obviously there’s going to be a connection between the writer and the people she writes about.

By: xNaRuToX

xNaRuToX — Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:34:45 +0000

I know you’re really desperate for a friend, but you shouldn’t try to start a game of mad libs in the comments section. This space is provided for level-headed people who want to make legitimate comments about the blog, not for lonely shut-ins with a thesaurus fetish.

Personally, I enjoy this blog. I think that Bulman is a great source for information on Charlottetown style, and an entertaining writer to boot. If you really don’t enjoy this blog, you might find one you do like if you spent less time writing sentences that make the reader feel like they’re walking through mud.

By: Chauvenistic Clout?

Chauvenistic Clout? — Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:07:16 +0000

To Lawn Mower Lawrence:
Never has an anonymous indulgence of such negative proportions stirred my blood so quickly. That is a mightly high, large, solid-hoofed, herbivorous ungulate, mammal you are on. If you look down, you may notice the ever intricate influences between the Houses of the Arts. Grim days lie ahead for those true feminist hearts, who save their breath for actual sightings of chauvinism.

By: Lawn Mower Lawrence

Lawn Mower Lawrence — Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:01:18 +0000

Never has a lackluster excuse for journalism left a more detestable wallop in my mouth. Is this fashion news or a banal attempt at chauvinistic clout? Grim days lie ahead for those whose hearts are true to indulgent relation from responsible scriveners. A ghastly, harebrained future awaits and only those who devote their credence to these partial blogs shall prosper. As for the rest of us, we are doomed to follow, much to our chagrin.